Academics Comments(Research strength in terms of: originality, innovation, quality, depth. Past training, experience, publications, impact. Research Plan and Potential for future development.)
Oral Communication / Professional Presentation Score
Evaluation Score:0 = unacceptable1 = poor2 = adequate3 = average4 = good5 = excellent ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Oral Communication / Professional Presentation Comments(Ability to communicate in English effectively, proper grammar;Level of effective communication skills, presentation skills, confidence, and professional manner.Ability to clearly and logically explain technical concepts, ideas, innovations. )
Character Qualities / Personalities Score
Evaluation Score:0 = unacceptable1 = poor2 = adequate3 = average4 = good5 = excellent ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Character Qualities / Personalities Comments(Colleagiality, suitability as a student mentor, how well the candidate fits in SIST faculty)
Education / Record Comments(Basic training, education record, service to academic community, visibility)
Written Communications and Research Plan Score
Evaluation Score:0 = unacceptable1 = poor2 = adequate3 = average4 = good5 = excellent ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Effectiveness as a Teacher Score
Evaluation Score:0 = unacceptable1 = poor2 = adequate3 = average4 = good5 = excellent ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
