Which text was this discussion on?
The seminar was well-paced, the use of time is efficient, and allocation of time across topics was reasonable.
Totally agree
Agree
Somewhat agree
Somewhat disagree
Disagree
I felt comfortable sharing my opinions in the discussion and the discussion atmosphere is open and friendly.
Totally agree
Agree
Somewhat agree
Somewhat disagree
Disagree
The DL encouraged us to do close reading and make arguments based on textual evidence.
Totally agree
Agree
Somewhat agree
Somewhat disagree
Disagree
I had a chance to speak up / got picked up by the DL.
Totally agree
Agree
Somewhat agree
Somewhat disagree
Disagree
The discussion has challenged my previous thought and I have benefited significantly from it.
Totally agree
Agree
Somewhat agree
Somewhat disagree
Disagree
What are your suggestions for the DL to improve this seminar in general? How can the DLs and staff members help improve your personal experience with Symposium? Anything else you really hope to be covered in the next session?
What's your overall impression of the two seminars on this text? What are your favorite and/or least favorite parts? (You might want to comment on some of these aspects but not necessarily all of them. Feel free to add anything that's not included here: content / structure / pace / atmosphere etc.)
What's your key take-away from the discussion on this text?
Anything else you want to let us know?