2016 Writing Consultants Performance Evaluation2016 写作顾问工作满意度调查

5：Pay very close attention to work details, and keep excellent track of students' progress and WS's feedback quality.  

4：Pay relatively close attention to students' progress and WS's feedback quality. Willing to track students' progress and WS's feedback quality. 

3：Sometimes pay attention to students' progress and WS's feedback quality. After being reminded, could take effective steps to follow up with students.

2：Find it hard to control students' progress and WS's feedback quality. After being notified of the problem, still take long time to correct.  

1：Do not pay attention to students' progress and WS's feedback quality.

5： Frequently communicate with WS's and can empathize with WS's. Take initiative to communicate and collaborate with WS's regarding work matters to solve problems. Take initiative to share information and reminder others about their mistakes and problems in order to help them improve. 

5：  Have strong expertise and broad knowledge scope of one's own position, and is recognized as an expert.  At the meanwhile can master basic knowledge of the overall company business and is very familiar with all basic and necessary company and business information.   

4：  Have strong  expertise and broad knowledge scope of one's own position, and is recognized as an expert. However, not very familiar with other company information or business that is not directlyrelated to one's own position.

3：  Professional knowledge and skills are ranked among top 50% in one's own department.

2：  Professional knowledge and skills are average but is above the minimum requirement.

1：  Fail to meet the minimum requirement for professional knowledge and skills. Not qualified for the position.