Which intake are you from
What previous knowledge did you have about the subject taught:
none
little
average
good
very good
Did you prepare for this lecture
how many hours did you prepare for this course?
How do you assess the active participation of the students during the lecture?
very bad
bad
satisfactory
good
very good
How do you assess the quality of the students' contribution to the lecture?
very bad
bad
satisfactory
good
very good
7. How did you find the learning environment(room, visibility, media used etc
The lecturer's English language skills were
very bad
bad
satisfactory
good
very good
How was your current level of English for this lecture?
very bad
bad
satisfactory
good
very good
Comprehensibility and Content
| | Total agree | agree | disagree | completely disagree | unable to judge |
| The lecturer explained the learning objectives. | | | | | |
| The lecturer gives an overview of the topics dealt within the lecture (structure) | | | | | |
| I was able to recognise a clear structure. | | | | | |
| The lecturer gave clear, practical examples which I could understand. | | | | | |
| The lecture explained even difficult topics in a comprehensible manner. | | | | | |
| The examination requirements were explained clearly and I understand them. | | | | | |
| I was given the impression that the lecturer was well-prepared for this lecture. | | | | | |
| The lecturer could even present dry topics in an interesting way. | | | | | |
teaching Techniques
| | Total agree | agree | disagree | completely disagree | unable to judge |
| Students were encouraged to work on their own. | | | | | |
| The lecturer gave the students the opportunity todiscuss items / ask questions. | | | | | |
Lecture Material
| | Total agree | agree | disagree | completely disagree | unable to judge |
| The structure and contents of the lecture material were comprehensible. | | | | | |
| The material used by the lecturer was useful for the course. | | | | | |
| The presentation slides and charts used were clear. | | | | | |