本页仅为文字内容,不可回答。

20220119 钱宸 | Faculty Interview Evaluation

您好,感谢您能抽出宝贵的时间来参与此次调查问卷!
Applicant Name
钱宸
AcademicsScore(Research strength in terms of: originality, innovation, quality, depth. Past training, experience, publications, impact. Research Plan and Potential for future development.)
Evaluation Score: 0 = unacceptable 1 = poor 2 = adequate 3 = average 4 = good 5 = excellent ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Character Qualities / Personalities Score(Colleagiality, suitability as a student mentor, how well the candidate fits in SIST faculty)
Evaluation Score:0 = unacceptable1 = poor2 = adequate3 = average4 = good5 = excellent ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Education / Record Score(Basic training, education record, service to academic community, visibility)
Evaluation Score:0 = unacceptable1 = poor2 = adequate3 = average4 = good5 = excellent ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
Effectiveness as a Teacher Score
Evaluation Score:0 = unacceptable1 = poor2 = adequate3 = average4 = good5 = excellent ★ ★ ★ ★ ★