本期课程的老师为：David，请大家为 David 老师进行打分；其中评分区间为： 1- 6分（分数越高，越满意）
1：Strongly disagree
2：Disagree 3：Slightly disagree
4：Slightly agree 5：Agree
6：Strongly agree
Demonstrated subject knowledge expertise and illustrated the practical business applications of course content (relevancy to the workplace) 展示专业知识，并说明课程内容的实务应用（与工作场所相关）
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Provided practical exercises, examples, applications, and illustrations of course content. 提供实际练习、范例、应用程序和说明课程内容
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Addressed any student needs, presented the material at an appropriate level, and assessed participants’ comprehension. 满足任何学生需求，并评估学员的理解能力，依据学员程度讲解教材
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Delivered information effectively (eye contact, use of voice, body language, enthusiasm, composure, self-confidence, and overall attitude, etc.) 有效地传递信息（眼神交流、使用语音、肢体语言、热情、镇定、自信和整体态度等）
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Used media effectively (flipcharts, PowerPoint, overheads, projector, etc.) 有效使用教学工具及辅助媒体
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Listened well to participants. 倾听参与者的意见
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Stimulated participation, asked questions that encouraged reflective thinking, and gave adequate answers to questions. 鼓励参与，提出鼓励反思性思维的问题，并给出足够的问题答案
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Stated objectives and main points clearly at the beginning of each lesson and summarized main points at the end of each lesson. 在每节课开始时明确说明目标和要点，并在每节课结束时总结要点
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Covered subject adequately and delivered at a pace enabling participants to meet objectives 涵盖的主题充分，并以使参与者能够依据进度达到学习目标
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
Managed class time effectively, stayed within time limits, was concise, and stayed on topic 有效管理上课时间，保持在时间限制内，简洁明了，并专注在主题上
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢？
What were the things that the instructor did well? 讲师哪方面表现优异？
Were there any improvements the instructor should have made? 讲师哪方面应该可以改进呢？