本期课程的老师为:David,请大家为 David 老师进行打分;其中评分区间为: 1- 6分(分数越高,越满意)
1:Strongly disagree
2:Disagree 3:Slightly disagree
4:Slightly agree 5:Agree
6:Strongly agree
Demonstrated subject knowledge expertise and illustrated the practical business applications of course content (relevancy to the workplace) 展示专业知识,并说明课程内容的实务应用(与工作场所相关)
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Provided practical exercises, examples, applications, and illustrations of course content. 提供实际练习、范例、应用程序和说明课程内容
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Addressed any student needs, presented the material at an appropriate level, and assessed participants’ comprehension. 满足任何学生需求,并评估学员的理解能力,依据学员程度讲解教材
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Delivered information effectively (eye contact, use of voice, body language, enthusiasm, composure, self-confidence, and overall attitude, etc.) 有效地传递信息(眼神交流、使用语音、肢体语言、热情、镇定、自信和整体态度等)
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Used media effectively (flipcharts, PowerPoint, overheads, projector, etc.) 有效使用教学工具及辅助媒体
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Listened well to participants. 倾听参与者的意见
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Stimulated participation, asked questions that encouraged reflective thinking, and gave adequate answers to questions. 鼓励参与,提出鼓励反思性思维的问题,并给出足够的问题答案
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Stated objectives and main points clearly at the beginning of each lesson and summarized main points at the end of each lesson. 在每节课开始时明确说明目标和要点,并在每节课结束时总结要点
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Covered subject adequately and delivered at a pace enabling participants to meet objectives 涵盖的主题充分,并以使参与者能够依据进度达到学习目标
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
Managed class time effectively, stayed within time limits, was concise, and stayed on topic 有效管理上课时间,保持在时间限制内,简洁明了,并专注在主题上
Why did you choose score under 5 ?
是出现了什么问题呢?
What were the things that the instructor did well? 讲师哪方面表现优异?
Were there any improvements the instructor should have made? 讲师哪方面应该可以改进呢?